Application by Simon Monteiro pursuant to s. 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2014] NSWSC 710
Error was established in the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal, which treated the standard non-parole period as determinative, contrary to the principles in Muldrock. Therefore, doubt arises as to a mitigating circumstance, justifying the application and referral.
- Parties
- Applicant: Simon Monteiro; Respondent: Attorney-General for NSW
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S. 78 of the Crimes (appeal and Review) Act 2001 / Application for Referral to Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted. Matter referred to Court of Criminal Appeal as an appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Standard Non Parole Period, Muldrock Error, Appeal Procedure, Referral Under S. 78 Crimes (appeal and Review) Act 2001
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Monteiro
Applicant
Attorney-General for NSW
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under S. 78 of the Crimes (appeal and Review) Act 2001 / Application for Referral to Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed were infected by Muldrock error regarding the standard non-parole period
- 2 Whether error gives rise to a doubt or question as to a mitigating circumstance warranting referral
Ratio Decidendi
Error was established in the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal, which treated the standard non-parole period as determinative, contrary to the principles in Muldrock. Therefore, doubt arises as to a mitigating circumstance, justifying the application and referral.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Matter referred to Court of Criminal Appeal as an appeal.
Orders
- The application is granted.
- The matter is referred to the Court of Criminal Appeal to be dealt with as an appeal under the Criminal Appeal Act 1912.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment