Yacoub v R [2021] NSWCCA 166
No further direction under Liberato was necessary as appropriate directions were given and the form of direction agreed by counsel and judge; the sentencing judge's reference to money laundering did not constitute a De Simoni error or inflation of criminality; leave to appeal conviction refused and sentence appeal dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Simon Yacoub; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Decision on Applications for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal conviction refused; leave to appeal sentence granted but appeal dismissed; extensions of time granted.
- Legal Topics
- Conviction Appeal, Jury Direction, Burden of Proof, Dealing With Proceeds of Crime, Reasonable Grounds to Suspect, Criminal Appeal Rules, Sentencing, Money Laundering, De Simoni Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Yacoub
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Decision on Applications for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge failed to direct the jury regarding burden of proof as per Liberato v The Queen
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred by referring to money laundering and inflating objective criminality (De Simoni error)
Ratio Decidendi
No further direction under Liberato was necessary as appropriate directions were given and the form of direction agreed by counsel and judge; the sentencing judge's reference to money laundering did not constitute a De Simoni error or inflation of criminality; leave to appeal conviction refused and sentence appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal conviction refused; leave to appeal sentence granted but appeal dismissed; extensions of time granted.
Orders
- Extension of time to file application for leave to appeal conviction to 7 January 2021 granted.
- Leave to appeal conviction refused pursuant to r 4.15 of the Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021 (NSW).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment