Selkirk v Director of Public Prosecutions [2020] NSWSC 1590
The magistrate erred by not separately addressing the element of dishonesty and by failing to consider whether the prosecution had excluded beyond reasonable doubt the possibility of Ms Selkirk’s claim of right to the refunds. This omission required the convictions to be set aside and the matters to be remitted for re-determination.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Local Court Conviction to Supreme Court
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal From Local Court to Supreme Court' 'dishonesty' 'deception' 'claim of Right' 'financial Advantage' 'proceeds of Crime']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Local Court Conviction to Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the magistrate erred in conflating deception and dishonesty' 'Whether the magistrate applied the correct onus of proof regarding dishonesty and claim of right' 'Whether there was evidence of financial advantage']
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrate erred by not separately addressing the element of dishonesty and by failing to consider whether the prosecution had excluded beyond reasonable doubt the possibility of Ms Selkirk’s claim of right to the refunds. This omission required the convictions to be set aside and the matters to be remitted for re-determination.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal on Ground 1' 'Appeal allowed' 'Set aside each conviction for charges in sequences 29 to 52 in matter no. 2018/00315831, H number 6829324 entered in the Local Court at Sydney Downing Centre on 18 December 2019' 'Remit the matter to the Local Court sitting at Sydney Downing Centre for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment