Wolfenden v International Theme Park Pty Ltd (trading as Wonderland) & Anor [2008] NSWCA 78
By majority, the evidence did not establish on the balance of probabilities that the appellant’s fall was caused by her foot stepping on the black tape as opposed to an accidental fall during a high kick; accordingly, causation was not proven and the appeal failed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Simone Wolfenden; First Respondent: International Theme Park Pty Ltd (trading as Wonderland); Second Respondent: The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Parramatta
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Causation, Personal Injury, Standard of Care, Evidence in Civil Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simone Wolfenden
Appellant
International Theme Park Pty Ltd (trading as Wonderland)
First Respondent
The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Parramatta
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant’s fall was caused by slipping on the black tape marking the dance area (causation)
- 2 Whether negligence and breach of duty were established
- 3 Whether sufficient evidence was available to infer causation by the tape rather than other factors
Ratio Decidendi
By majority, the evidence did not establish on the balance of probabilities that the appellant’s fall was caused by her foot stepping on the black tape as opposed to an accidental fall during a high kick; accordingly, causation was not proven and the appeal failed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment