John Robert Rousell v Singleton Council [2024] NSWLEC 1279
The appeal was upheld because the modification satisfied the statutory requirements under s 4.55 and resolved Council's contentions, with no further environmental impact and improved stormwater design.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; modification granted
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'stormwater Drainage' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether modification of Condition 8 of Development Consent 8.2022.239.1 should be permitted' 'Whether the modification meets the requirements under s 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was upheld because the modification satisfied the statutory requirements under s 4.55 and resolved Council's contentions, with no further environmental impact and improved stormwater design.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; modification granted
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Consent 8.2022.239.1 is modified by consent in the terms set out in Annexure A.' 'Development Consent 8.2022.239.1 is subject to the consolidated conditions as modified by the Court and described in Annexure B.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment