Macdonald v Macdonald [2018] NSWSC 64
There was no evidence of non-compliance with Procedural Direction No 3, and the plaintiff was afforded procedural fairness; thus, there was no sufficiently arguable ground to grant leave to appeal from the Appeal Panel's decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal From Appeal Panel of NCAT
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal From Tribunal Decision' 'procedural Directions Compliance' 'consent Orders' 'residential Tenancy Agreement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal From Appeal Panel of NCAT
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to appeal from Appeal Panel of NCAT' 'Whether there was non-compliance with Procedural Direction No 3' 'Whether there was procedural unfairness in NCAT conciliation or consent orders']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence of non-compliance with Procedural Direction No 3, and the plaintiff was afforded procedural fairness; thus, there was no sufficiently arguable ground to grant leave to appeal from the Appeal Panel's decision.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused with costs
Orders
- ['Refuse leave to the plaintiff to appeal against the decision of the Appeal Panel made on 28 November 2016.' "Unless an application for a different order is made in writing to my Associate within seven days hereof, order the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings." 'Grant liberty to the party in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment