R v Cupac [2018] NSWDC 433

R v Cupac [2018] NSWDC 433

The matter is adjourned under s 11 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act to allow Mr Cupac to demonstrate rehabilitation through abstaining from drug use and providing urinalysis results, which will influence the sentence imposed.

Parties
Prosecution: The Crown; Defendant: Sinisa Cupac
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence Adjournment Bail Order
Outcome
Bailed under s 11 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act with conditions; sentence adjourned to 9 May 2019.
Legal Topics
Sentence, Supply Prohibited Drug, MDMA
Criminal Law Sentence Supply Prohibited Drug MDMA

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Crown

Prosecution

Sinisa Cupac

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentence Adjournment Bail Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Sinisa Cupac should be sentenced immediately or benefit from adjournment under s 11 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act to demonstrate rehabilitation

Ratio Decidendi

The matter is adjourned under s 11 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act to allow Mr Cupac to demonstrate rehabilitation through abstaining from drug use and providing urinalysis results, which will influence the sentence imposed.

Court Disposition

Bailed under s 11 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act with conditions; sentence adjourned to 9 May 2019.

Orders

  • Mr Cupac is to use no illegal drugs whatsoever.
  • He is to undergo regular urinalysis, at least fortnightly, arranged at his own expense.