Sirtex Medical Limited, in the matter of Sirtex Medical Limited [2018] FCA 584
The Court ordered the convening of the scheme meeting and approved distribution of the scheme booklet because Sirtex was a Part 5.1 body, the proposed transaction was prima facie an arrangement properly and bona fide proposed, the scheme booklet would provide proper disclosure, the procedural requirements were met, electronic notification was permissible, and no matter identified, including the single shareholder class, exclusivity arrangements and break fee, deed poll, performance risk or conditions precedent, provided a reason to refuse the orders at the first hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Orders Under S 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) in Relation to a Proposed Scheme of Arrangement / First Hearing; Orders Made to Convene Scheme Meeting and Approve Scheme Booklet
- Outcome
- Orders made as sought by Sirtex.
- Legal Topics
- ['scheme of Arrangement' "convening of Members' Meeting" 'explanatory Statement' 'shareholder Classes' 'deal Protection Clauses' 'deed Poll' 'performance Risk' 'conditions Precedent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Orders Under S 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) in Relation to a Proposed Scheme of Arrangement / First Hearing; Orders Made to Convene Scheme Meeting and Approve Scheme Booklet
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Sirtex was a Part 5.1 body and the proposed scheme was an arrangement for the purposes of s 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether the scheme booklet would provide proper disclosure to members as required by s 412(1)(a) and the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether procedural requirements under the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) had been met.' 'Whether electronic notification to shareholders who elected to receive notices by email was appropriate.' 'Whether any matter, including voting classes, deal protection clauses, the deed poll, performance risk or conditions precedent, provided a reason not to order the scheme meeting.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court ordered the convening of the scheme meeting and approved distribution of the scheme booklet because Sirtex was a Part 5.1 body, the proposed transaction was prima facie an arrangement properly and bona fide proposed, the scheme booklet would provide proper disclosure, the procedural requirements were met, electronic notification was permissible, and no matter identified, including the single shareholder class, exclusivity arrangements and break fee, deed poll, performance risk or conditions precedent, provided a reason to refuse the orders at the first hearing.
Court Disposition
Orders made as sought by Sirtex.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to subsection 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Sirtex was ordered to convene a meeting of holders of ordinary shares for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, agreeing to the proposed scheme of arrangement.' 'The Scheme Meeting was ordered to be held at 10:00 am (AEST) on 7 May 2018 at...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment