Siruse Pty. Limited v. Warringah Shire Council [1989] NSWLEC 186

Siruse Pty. Limited v. Warringah Shire Council [1989] NSWLEC 186

Development consent was refused due to the essential presence of a large two storey car park directly on the foreshore, which was considered visually out of character and detrimental to the area, outweighing environmental benefits of the proposed development.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 May 1989
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
development consent refused
Legal Topics
['development Consent' 'marina Extension' 'foreshore Scenic Protection']
['planning and Environment'] ['development Consent' 'marina Extension' 'foreshore Scenic Protection']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether development consent should be granted for extension to marina and redevelopment of shore based facilities' 'Whether the proposed development would have adverse visual and environmental impacts' 'Adequacy of Environmental Impact Statement in addressing water quality']

Ratio Decidendi

Development consent was refused due to the essential presence of a large two storey car park directly on the foreshore, which was considered visually out of character and detrimental to the area, outweighing environmental benefits of the proposed development.

Court Disposition

development consent refused

Orders

  • ['Development consent is refused.']