Inspector McCarthy (nee Shaw) v Siva & Jeya Pty Ltd [2015] NSWDC 15
The defendant failed to provide adequate information, instruction, training, and direction to Anisha Shrestha and failed to undertake a formal risk assessment for the task of re-fuelling burner pots with methylated spirits, which materially contributed to the risk and occurrence of serious burn injuries, breaching s...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Defendant convicted
- Legal Topics
- ['workplace Safety' "employer's Duties" 'risk Assessment' 'training and Supervision']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant breached s 8(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 by failing to ensure health, safety and welfare at work.' 'Whether the equipment (burner pots with methylated spirits) was safe plant and equipment.' 'Whether the system of work involving the use of methylated spirits constituted a safe system.' 'Whether adequate information, instruction, training, and supervision were provided to Anisha Shrestha.' 'Whether a documented risk assessment was undertaken.']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant failed to provide adequate information, instruction, training, and direction to Anisha Shrestha and failed to undertake a formal risk assessment for the task of re-fuelling burner pots with methylated spirits, which materially contributed to the risk and occurrence of serious burn injuries, breaching s 8(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000.
Court Disposition
Defendant convicted
Orders
- ['Defendant guilty of the offence charged in the summons and convicted accordingly']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment