SJ v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 160

SJ v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 160

The sentencing judge did not err in assessing the applicant's lack of genuine remorse, sufficiently considered the principles relevant to sentencing young offenders, and the sentence was not manifestly excessive given the objective gravity and circumstances of the offence.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 July 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Disposition
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['aggravated Robbery' 'sentencing' 'young Offender' 'remorse' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence']
['criminal Law'] ['aggravated Robbery' 'sentencing' 'young Offender' 'remorse' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Disposition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether sentencing judge erred in finding applicant was not remorseful' 'Whether principles governing sentencing juvenile offenders applied' 'Whether sentence imposed was manifestly excessive']

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge did not err in assessing the applicant's lack of genuine remorse, sufficiently considered the principles relevant to sentencing young offenders, and the sentence was not manifestly excessive given the objective gravity and circumstances of the offence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Extend the time for seeking leave to appeal up to and including 6 May 2011' 'Grant leave to appeal' 'Dismiss the appeal']