Skelton v Jones [1961] HCA 83
There is no sufficient reason to intervene or grant special leave where the matter concerns the admission of an appeal as of right to the Privy Council from the State Court and not a federal issue; such objections should be raised before the Privy Council.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Special Leave to Appeal / High Court Special Leave Application
- Outcome
- Special leave refused with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['special Leave to Appeal' 'right of Appeal to Privy Council' 'jurisdiction of Courts']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Special Leave to Appeal / High Court Special Leave Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether special leave to appeal should be granted from an order granting conditional leave to appeal to the Privy Council under the Order in Council 1909' 'Whether the amount involved satisfied the conditions for an appeal as of right to the Privy Council under s 2(a) of the Order in Council']
Ratio Decidendi
There is no sufficient reason to intervene or grant special leave where the matter concerns the admission of an appeal as of right to the Privy Council from the State Court and not a federal issue; such objections should be raised before the Privy Council.
Court Disposition
Special leave refused with costs.
Orders
- ['Special leave refused with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment