Borovina v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2007] NSWADT 80
Given the ICAC's finding (which is not contradicted by clear evidence) that Mr Borovina knowingly supplied false information in his licence application, combined with his persistent breaches of the Home Building Act by working while unlicensed and a lack of compelling reputation and character evidence, Mr Borovina is not a fit and proper person to hold a contractor licence as required by section 20(1)(a) and (1A) of the Home Building Act 1989.
- Parties
- Applicant: Slavisa Borovina; Respondent: Commissioner for Fair Trading
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Appeal Before Tribunal From Refusal of Contractor Licence
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; decision affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Home Building Act, Contractor Licensing, Fit and Proper Person, Corrupt Conduct, Regulatory Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Slavisa Borovina
Applicant
Commissioner for Fair Trading
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Appeal Before Tribunal From Refusal of Contractor Licence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Borovina is a fit and proper person to hold a contractor licence (carpenter) under the Home Building Act 1989
Ratio Decidendi
Given the ICAC's finding (which is not contradicted by clear evidence) that Mr Borovina knowingly supplied false information in his licence application, combined with his persistent breaches of the Home Building Act by working while unlicensed and a lack of compelling reputation and character evidence, Mr Borovina is not a fit and proper person to hold a contractor licence as required by section 20(1)(a) and (1A) of the Home Building Act 1989.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; decision affirmed
Orders
- The Commissioner's decision to refuse Mr Borovina's application for a contractor licence (carpenter) is affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment