Sly Boogie Customs Pty Ltd v Duggan [2021] NSWCATAP 72
Leave to appeal was refused because the appellant did not establish that it may have suffered a substantial miscarriage of justice. The Member's finding that Mr Duggan contracted with Mr Low as a sole trader was reasonably available on the evidence, including the quote and receipts, and the accountant's general letter had little probative value. The award of $17,000 was also reasonably open because Mr Duggan's case and quotes concerned rectification of both paintwork and other repair defects, and no alternative repair quote was provided by Mr Low.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal in a Consumer Claim Concerning Defective Motor Vehicle Repair and Paintwork / Appeal Panel Hearing on Leave to Appeal and Appeal From a Consumer and Commercial Division Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['internal Appeal' 'leave to Appeal' 'substantial Miscarriage of Justice' 'against the Weight of Evidence' 'fair and Equitable Decision' 'proper Respondent to Tribunal Proceedings' 'quantum of Damages' 'defective Motor Vehicle Repairs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal in a Consumer Claim Concerning Defective Motor Vehicle Repair and Paintwork / Appeal Panel Hearing on Leave to Appeal and Appeal From a Consumer and Commercial Division Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted on the basis that the Tribunal decision was not fair and equitable or was against the weight of the evidence.' 'Whether the Tribunal erred in finding that Mr Duggan contracted with Tristan Low trading as Sly Boogie Customs rather than Sly Boogie Customs Pty Ltd.' 'Whether the amount of $17,000 awarded for defective work was reasonably open on the evidence.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the appellant did not establish that it may have suffered a substantial miscarriage of justice. The Member's finding that Mr Duggan contracted with Mr Low as a sole trader was reasonably available on the evidence, including the quote and receipts, and the accountant's general letter had little probative value. The award of $17,000 was also reasonably open because Mr Duggan's case and quotes concerned rectification of both paintwork and other repair defects, and no alternative repair quote was provided by Mr Low.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal refused.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment