Smartec Capital Pty Limited v Centro Properties Limited [2011] FCA 716
Expedition was refused and the proceeding was summarily dismissed because the relief sought would postpone, restrain or affect completion of the Stock Purchase Agreement and therefore had the potential to adversely affect parties to that agreement, including sellers and the purchaser, who were not joined. Those necessary parties could not be joined in time for determination before 30 June 2011, and after the issue was raised Smartec gave no indication that it intended to join them. In those circumstances Centro discharged its onus under s 31A(2) and established that the proceeding, as constituted, had no reasonable prospects of success.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Proceeding Seeking Declarations, Directions and Injunctions in Relation to Alleged Contravention of ASX Listing Rule 11.2, Brought Pursuant to S 793 C and S 1101 B of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) and the General Law / Interlocutory Application for Expedition and Defendants' Notices of Motion, Including Summary Dismissal Under S 31 A(2) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (cth)
- Outcome
- Proceeding dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay defendants' costs, with costs incurred after 5 pm on 17 June 2011 on an indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['expedition' 'summary Dismissal' 'asx Listing Rule 11.2' 'joinder of Necessary Parties' 'service Outside Jurisdiction' 'indemnity Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Proceeding Seeking Declarations, Directions and Injunctions in Relation to Alleged Contravention of ASX Listing Rule 11.2, Brought Pursuant to S 793 C and S 1101 B of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) and the General Law / Interlocutory Application for Expedition and Defendants' Notices of Motion, Including Summary Dismissal Under S 31 A(2) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceeding should be expedited so that it could be heard and decided before completion of the US Assets Sale no later than 30 June 2011' 'Whether Smartec had demonstrated a prima facie case for relief requiring compliance with ASX Listing Rule 11.2' 'Whether the proceeding was properly constituted where parties to the Stock Purchase Agreement, including sellers and the purchaser, had not been joined' 'Whether the non-joinder of materially interested parties meant the proceeding had no reasonable prospects of success under s 31A(2) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)' 'Whether the defendants should have indemnity costs after 5 pm on 17 June 2011']
Ratio Decidendi
Expedition was refused and the proceeding was summarily dismissed because the relief sought would postpone, restrain or affect completion of the Stock Purchase Agreement and therefore had the potential to adversely affect parties to that agreement, including sellers and the purchaser, who were not joined. Those necessary parties could not be joined in time for determination before 30 June 2011, and after the issue was raised Smartec gave no indication that it intended to join them. In those circumstances Centro discharged its onus under s 31A(2) and established that the proceeding, as constituted, had no reasonable prospects of success.
Court Disposition
Proceeding dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay defendants' costs, with costs incurred after 5 pm on 17 June 2011 on an indemnity basis.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 31A(2) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the proceeding be dismissed.' "The plaintiff pay the defendants' costs." "The defendants' costs incurred after 5 pm on 17 June 2011 be paid on an indemnity basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment