Smartec Capital Pty Limited v Centro (CPL) Limited & Anor [2011] NSWSC 644
The plaintiff is entitled, under s 247A of the Corporations Act, to inspect both correspondence and records of oral communications between the defendants and the ASX concerning the applicability or application of listing rules 11.1.2 and 11.2 to the US assets sale transaction, as described, but not to the much wider class of documents originally sought. Inspection is to be by specified persons only. The use of documents is confined to proper purposes, notably for proceedings under s 793C and s 1101B of the Corporations Act. The plaintiff, while partially successful, was not the substantially successful party and must pay 50 per cent of the defendants' costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Practice and Procedure / Post Judgment Orders Following Previous Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders made for restricted inspection and use of books, limited authorisations for persons, and partial costs order in favour of defendants.
- Legal Topics
- ['inspection of Company Books' 'proper Purpose for Inspection' 'use of Inspected Documents' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Practice and Procedure / Post Judgment Orders Following Previous Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Scope of documents required to be made available for inspection under Corporations Act s 247A' 'Persons authorised to inspect documents' 'Permitted purposes and use of inspected documents' 'Allocation of legal costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff is entitled, under s 247A of the Corporations Act, to inspect both correspondence and records of oral communications between the defendants and the ASX concerning the applicability or application of listing rules 11.1.2 and 11.2 to the US assets sale transaction, as described, but not to the much wider class of documents originally sought. Inspection is to be by specified persons only. The use of documents is confined to proper purposes, notably for proceedings under s 793C and s 1101B of the Corporations Act. The plaintiff, while partially successful, was not the substantially successful party and must pay 50 per cent of the defendants' costs.
Court Disposition
Orders made for restricted inspection and use of books, limited authorisations for persons, and partial costs order in favour of defendants.
Orders
- ['Order pursuant to s 247A(1)(a) Corporations Act: plaintiff authorised to inspect specified books (correspondence and oral communication records with ASX about listing rules 11.1.2 and 11.2 and the US assets sale transaction) of both defendants.' 'Named persons permitted to inspect the books on behalf of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment