Smith & Co (Sales Agency) Pty Ltd v Leather.Com Pty Ltd [2006] NSWADT 71
The evidence and accounts showed rent was not substantially in arrears at the time of bond appropriation, the bond was not invested as required, and the respondent failed to justify any significant deductions beyond minor setoff for unpaid rent/outgoings. The whole bond, with interest and abated by minor outstanding sums, was repayable to the applicant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Matter / Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- Respondent to pay Applicant $30,894.36 forthwith.
- Legal Topics
- ['refund of Security Bond' 'calculation of Rent and Outgoings' 'lease Commencement Date' 'bond Investment and Interest' 'set Off and Abatement Agreements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Principal Matter / Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['When liability for sub-lease rent started' 'The true state of accounts between the parties' 'Amount of bond (if any) to be refunded on termination']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence and accounts showed rent was not substantially in arrears at the time of bond appropriation, the bond was not invested as required, and the respondent failed to justify any significant deductions beyond minor setoff for unpaid rent/outgoings. The whole bond, with interest and abated by minor outstanding sums, was repayable to the applicant.
Court Disposition
Respondent to pay Applicant $30,894.36 forthwith.
Orders
- ['Respondent to pay Applicant $30,894.36 comprising restitution of the bond, damages for failure to invest the bond, and interest pursuant to Section 72A.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment