Smith v The Queen [1985] HCA 62

Smith v The Queen [1985] HCA 62

The majority found that the circumstances did not justify granting special leave to appeal, as the matters raised involved the exercise of judicial discretion with no clear error shown, and not all relevant facts appeared from the material before the Court.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Special Leave to Appeal
Outcome
special leave to appeal refused by majority
Legal Topics
['mc Kenzie Friend' 'trial Procedure' 'judicial Discretion' 'jury Security' 'private Communication Between Judge and Jury' 'open Justice']
['criminal Law'] ['mc Kenzie Friend' 'trial Procedure' 'judicial Discretion' 'jury Security' 'private Communication Between Judge and Jury' 'open Justice']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Special Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the trial judge properly exercised discretion in refusing a McKenzie friend for the accused' 'Whether the handling of jury security precautions prejudiced the accused' 'Whether failure to disclose a private communication from the jury foreman was a breach of the principle of public criminal trials']

Ratio Decidendi

The majority found that the circumstances did not justify granting special leave to appeal, as the matters raised involved the exercise of judicial discretion with no clear error shown, and not all relevant facts appeared from the material before the Court.

Court Disposition

special leave to appeal refused by majority

Orders

  • ['Special leave to appeal refused.']