SmithKline Beecham plc v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1898
No practical advantage would be gained by varying the pre-action discovery orders because the relevant information is protected by legal professional privilege and is not intended to be used in the English proceedings; the philosophy of pre-action discovery militates against widening the use of such material for extraneous purposes.
- Parties
- Applicant: SmithKline Beecham plc; Applicant: Beecham Group plc; Applicant: SmithKline Beecham (Australia) Pty Limited; Respondent: Alphapharm Pty Ltd; Respondent: University of Queensland
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Motion to Vary Pre Action Discovery Orders / Post Pre Action Discovery, Interlocutory Motion
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Pre Action Discovery, Confidentiality Orders, Foreign Proceedings, Legal Professional Privilege
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SmithKline Beecham plc
Applicant
Beecham Group plc
Applicant
SmithKline Beecham (Australia) Pty Limited
Applicant
Alphapharm Pty Ltd
Respondent
University of Queensland
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Motion to Vary Pre Action Discovery Orders / Post Pre Action Discovery, Interlocutory Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether orders restricting use of pre-action discovery information should be varied to assist a foreign proceeding
- 2 Whether privileged material can be compelled for use in foreign litigation
Ratio Decidendi
No practical advantage would be gained by varying the pre-action discovery orders because the relevant information is protected by legal professional privilege and is not intended to be used in the English proceedings; the philosophy of pre-action discovery militates against widening the use of such material for extraneous purposes.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed
Orders
- The motion be dismissed.
- The respondents (applicants in this motion) pay the applicants' costs of the motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment