SafeWork NSW v SNAP Programs Limited; SafeWork NSW v State of New South Wales (Department of Communities and Justice) [2021] NSWDC 203
Given the consent of the senior available next of kin, the absence of opposition from the parties, the very low risk of harm, and the public interest in publication, it is appropriate to revoke the non-publication and pseudonym orders so that the names of Riley Shortland and Rachel Martin may be published.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Revocation of Non Publication and Pseudonym Orders Prior to Sentencing
- Outcome
- Non-publication and pseudonym orders revoked.
- Legal Topics
- ['suppression Orders' 'non Publication Orders' 'work Health and Safety Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Revocation of Non Publication and Pseudonym Orders Prior to Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the non-publication and pseudonym orders regarding the deceased persons' names should be revoked."]
Ratio Decidendi
Given the consent of the senior available next of kin, the absence of opposition from the parties, the very low risk of harm, and the public interest in publication, it is appropriate to revoke the non-publication and pseudonym orders so that the names of Riley Shortland and Rachel Martin may be published.
Court Disposition
Non-publication and pseudonym orders revoked.
Orders
- ['The non-publication orders and pseudonym orders made by the Court on 27 April 2020 and 29 July 2020 are revoked.' 'The young person can be referred to by his name, Riley Shortland.' 'The carer can be referred to by her name, Rachel Martin.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment