Solarus Projects Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers appointed) (in Liquidation) v AAI Limited Trading as Vero Insurance (No 8) [2015] NSWSC 412
Sub-paragraph (b) of the definition of Insured was construed businesslike and contextually as extending to companies and organisations subsidiary to, affiliated with, or associated with the named insured, Glen Alpine Properties Pty Ltd. Solarus and Properties were under the legal and actual control of Mr Bega, formed part of the Glen Alpine Group, and had a community of business interests and a relationship going beyond arm's length dealings. Solarus was therefore at least an associated company of Properties and was an insured under sub-paragraph (b) during both flood periods.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Insurance Contract Proceedings Concerning Indemnity Under a Project Contract Works Insurance Policy / Determination of Separate Questions Under R 28.2 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (nsw)
- Outcome
- Separate questions answered in favour of Solarus; Solarus was an insured under the policy during both flood periods by operation of sub-paragraph (b) of the definition of Insured.
- Legal Topics
- ['project Contract Works Insurance' 'interpretation of Insurance Policy' 'meaning of Insured' 'unnamed Insured' 'associated or Affiliated Companies' 'separate Questions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Insurance Contract Proceedings Concerning Indemnity Under a Project Contract Works Insurance Policy / Determination of Separate Questions Under R 28.2 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (nsw)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Solarus Projects Pty Ltd was an insured within the meaning of the Project Contract Works Insurance Policy during the Townsville flood occurring over the period 13 January to 17 February 2008.' 'Whether Solarus Projects Pty Ltd was an insured within the meaning of the Project Contract Works Insurance Policy during the Townsville flood occurring over the period 13 January to 4 February 2009.' 'Whether Solarus was an affiliated or associated company under sub-paragraph (b) of the definition of Insured.' 'Whether Solarus was a financier under sub-paragraph (c) of the definition of Insured.' 'Whether Solarus was a Contractor and/or Sub-Contractor under sub-paragraph (d) of the definition of Insured.' 'Whether contractual rectification should substitute Solarus for Properties as the named insured under sub-paragraph (a) of the definition of Insured.']
Ratio Decidendi
Sub-paragraph (b) of the definition of Insured was construed businesslike and contextually as extending to companies and organisations subsidiary to, affiliated with, or associated with the named insured, Glen Alpine Properties Pty Ltd. Solarus and Properties were under the legal and actual control of Mr Bega, formed part of the Glen Alpine Group, and had a community of business interests and a relationship going beyond arm's length dealings. Solarus was therefore at least an associated company of Properties and was an insured under sub-paragraph (b) during both flood periods.
Court Disposition
Separate questions answered in favour of Solarus; Solarus was an insured under the policy during both flood periods by operation of sub-paragraph (b) of the definition of Insured.
Orders
- ['Question 1 - During the Townsville flood occurring over the period 13 January to 17 February 2008 was Solarus Projects Pty Ltd an insured within the meaning of the Project Contract Works Insurance Policy issued to Glen Alpine Properties Limited and others numbered CTS010377771 dated 2nd May 2007? Answer Yes, by...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment