MILLER and ANOR v BECK [1998] NSWCA 142
The conventional measure of damages, being diminution in value, is not shown to create injustice in this case; rectification cost is inappropriate absent sufficient factual findings. Leave to appeal is not warranted.
- Parties
- Claimant: Miller; Opponent: Beck
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Summons for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor's Duty of Care, Measure of Damages, Unauthorised Building Works
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miller
Claimant
Beck
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Summons for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the solicitor breached the duty of care in failing to advise about unauthorised building works and need for s317AE certificate
- 2 Proper measure of damages in solicitor negligence concerning conveyancing
Ratio Decidendi
The conventional measure of damages, being diminution in value, is not shown to create injustice in this case; rectification cost is inappropriate absent sufficient factual findings. Leave to appeal is not warranted.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment