STEFANOVICH v CURRAN [1988] NSWCA 147
The claimant suffered legal damage, and his cause of action accrued, on the date his solicitors wrongfully consented to the adjournment, not on the later date when the defendant died. The legal obligation to pay solicitor/client costs is sufficient damage. Therefore, the cause of action accrued prior to the statement of claim, rendering it statute barred.
- Parties
- Claimant: Stefanovich; Opponent: Curran
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Summons for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal Refused
- Outcome
- leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Solicitors' Negligence, Statute of Limitations, Legal Accrual of Cause of Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stefanovich
Claimant
Curran
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Summons for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal Refused
Legal Issues
- 1 When does a cause of action in negligence accrue for statute of limitation purposes in the context of solicitors' negligence?
- 2 Does damage occur upon wrongful act (adjournment) or realization of subsequent loss (death of defendant)?
- 3 Are solicitor and client costs legal damage for limitation purposes?
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant suffered legal damage, and his cause of action accrued, on the date his solicitors wrongfully consented to the adjournment, not on the later date when the defendant died. The legal obligation to pay solicitor/client costs is sufficient damage. Therefore, the cause of action accrued prior to the statement of claim, rendering it statute barred.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal refused
Orders
- summons dismissed
- the claimant to pay the opponents' costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment