Solotel Pty Ltd v City of Sydney Council [2007] NSWLEC 230
The proposed alterations are consistent with objectives of the Mixed Use Zone, do not unreasonably impact heritage significance, and are acceptable with conditions to mitigate noise, prevent television screens in the Courtyard, and require equitable access improvements.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'heritage' 'residential Amenity' 'equitable Access' 'noise Impacts' 'cigarette Smoke' 'urban Design']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Compliance with heritage requirements of planning controls' 'Amenity impacts on neighbouring residential properties, especially noise' 'Provision of equitable access and accessible facilities to the proposed Courtyard']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed alterations are consistent with objectives of the Mixed Use Zone, do not unreasonably impact heritage significance, and are acceptable with conditions to mitigate noise, prevent television screens in the Courtyard, and require equitable access improvements.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld' 'Development application D/2006/01009 for alterations to the existing "Clock Hotel" at 470 - 474 Crown Street, Surrey Hills is determined by the granting of development consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A' 'Exhibit B is retained']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment