Songkal Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2000] NSWLEC 215
There was only one effective development application lodged in 1997; documents submitted in 1999-2000 were substantial amendments but did not constitute a new application. The appeal was brought out of time and is incompetent under ss 96-97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (class 1) / Preliminary Question of Law Determined, Listing for Further Disposition
- Outcome
- Negative answer to preliminary question; appeal to be listed for further disposition.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'deemed Refusal' 'appeal Period' 'formal Requirements' 'substantial Amendment of Application' 'jurisdiction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal (class 1) / Preliminary Question of Law Determined, Listing for Further Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal is incompetent as it was not filed within the statutory 12-month appeal period after the deemed refusal of the development application under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.']
Ratio Decidendi
There was only one effective development application lodged in 1997; documents submitted in 1999-2000 were substantial amendments but did not constitute a new application. The appeal was brought out of time and is incompetent under ss 96-97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Negative answer to preliminary question; appeal to be listed for further disposition.
Orders
- ['Preliminary question answered: Appeal is incompetent and out of time under ss 96-97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' 'Appeal listed for callover by Registrar on 27 October 2000.' 'No order as to costs.' 'Exhibit C1 (the LEP) may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment