Cerny v Randwick City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1403
The development application was refused because the proposed secondary dwelling would have an unreasonable adverse impact on the amenity of 248 Carrington Road, as a result of its visual bulk and lack of landscape softening, outweighing the general objectives for diverse housing needs even after considering flexible DCP application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Final Determination After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; development application refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'secondary Dwelling' 'streetscape' 'visual Amenity' 'affordable Rental Housing' 'development Control Plan Compliance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Final Determination After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed secondary dwelling is consistent with zone objectives and DCP provisions, particularly regarding streetscape and neighbouring visual amenity' 'Whether the development application should be refused due to adverse impact on neighbouring properties under the relevant planning instruments']
Ratio Decidendi
The development application was refused because the proposed secondary dwelling would have an unreasonable adverse impact on the amenity of 248 Carrington Road, as a result of its visual bulk and lack of landscape softening, outweighing the general objectives for diverse housing needs even after considering flexible DCP application.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; development application refused.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'Randwick City Council Development Application No. DA 712/2017 for a secondary dwelling at 250 Carrington Road Randwick is refused.' 'The exhibits are returned with the exception of Exhibit 1, A and B.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment