Clarke v Wakeling & Anor [2009] NSWSC 1230
The solicitor did not act negligently as his retainer was limited to explaining and witnessing mortgage documentation; he was not aware at the relevant time of the plaintiff's intention to on-lend the money to a third party. Even if a broader duty existed, there was no causation established as the plaintiff would have acted as she did regardless of any advice.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the defendants against the plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- ['negligence' "solicitor's Duty" 'causation' 'retainer Scope' 'advice on Investment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the solicitor (first defendant) was negligent in advising the plaintiff regarding mortgage and loan documents' "Whether the solicitor owed a duty to inquire or advise regarding the plaintiff's investment of loan proceeds" "Whether causation was established between any alleged breach and the plaintiff's loss"]
Ratio Decidendi
The solicitor did not act negligently as his retainer was limited to explaining and witnessing mortgage documentation; he was not aware at the relevant time of the plaintiff's intention to on-lend the money to a third party. Even if a broader duty existed, there was no causation established as the plaintiff would have acted as she did regardless of any advice.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the defendants against the plaintiff.
Orders
- ['Judgment entered in favour of the defendants against the plaintiff.' "Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs of these proceedings."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment