Herring -V- South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service Anor [1998] NSWEOT
The Tribunal found that the complainant had not provided sufficient evidence to establish that he was victimised because of prior proceedings. The respondent's actions in not granting an interview were attributed to the facts of his earlier termination, workplace harmony concerns, and unsuitability of referees, rather than to retaliation for previous complaints under the Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Equal Opportunity Tribunal Complaint / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Complaint dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['victimisation' 'employment Discrimination']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equal Opportunity Tribunal Complaint / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the complainant was victimised under section 50(1)(a) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 by being denied employment because he had previously brought proceedings against the respondent.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the complainant had not provided sufficient evidence to establish that he was victimised because of prior proceedings. The respondent's actions in not granting an interview were attributed to the facts of his earlier termination, workplace harmony concerns, and unsuitability of referees, rather than to retaliation for previous complaints under the Act.
Court Disposition
Complaint dismissed
Orders
- ['The complaint is dismissed.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment