R v Farrell [2003] NSWSC 300

R v Farrell [2003] NSWSC 300

The accused was found not guilty of murder by reason of mental illness, as he was, at the time of the offence, acting under such defect of reason from a disease of the mind as neither to know the nature and quality of the act nor, if he did know it, that he was doing what was wrong, thus satisfying the defence of mental illness under the M'Naghten Rules and applicable statutory provisions.

Parties
Crown: Regina; Accused: Stephen Patrick Farrell
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 April 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Special Hearing Pursuant to S19 of the Mental Health (criminal Procedure) Act 1990
Outcome
Not guilty by reason of mental illness
Legal Topics
Special Hearing, Murder, Defence of Mental Illness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Stephen Patrick Farrell

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Special Hearing Pursuant to S19 of the Mental Health (criminal Procedure) Act 1990

  1. 1 Whether the accused was not guilty of murder by reason of mental illness

Ratio Decidendi

The accused was found not guilty of murder by reason of mental illness, as he was, at the time of the offence, acting under such defect of reason from a disease of the mind as neither to know the nature and quality of the act nor, if he did know it, that he was doing what was wrong, thus satisfying the defence of mental illness under the M'Naghten Rules and applicable statutory provisions.

Court Disposition

Not guilty by reason of mental illness

Orders

  • Directed the entry of a verdict of not guilty by reason of mental illness
  • Ordered, pursuant to s39 of the Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act 1990, that the accused be detained in strict custody until released by due process of law