M Webster Holdings Pty Limited (administrators appointed) v Specific Freight Pty Limited [2017] FCA 269
It is appropriate to direct that administrators are justified in selling the goods in the ordinary course of business as proposed, given that the regime for setting aside proceeds and notifying suppliers provides adequate protection and balances urgency with suppliers' interests.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: M Webster Holdings Pty Limited ACN 003 766 925 (administrators appointed); Second Plaintiffs: Geoffrey and Andrew Barnden in their capacities as joint and several voluntary administrators of M Webster Holdings Pty Limited (administrators appointed) ACN 003 766 925; Defendant: Specific Freight Pty Limited ACN 006 664 124
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations and Corporate Insolvency / Application for Disposal of Goods Under S 442 C(2) of Corporations Act 2001 (cth); Urgent Hearing; Orders Made
- Outcome
- Application granted; orders made authorising sale of goods, setting aside of sale proceeds fund, notification to suppliers, and regime for claims.
- Legal Topics
- Voluntary Administration, Disposal of Company Property, Retention of Title, Security Interests, Storage Liens, Sale of Goods, Distribution of Sale Proceeds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M Webster Holdings Pty Limited ACN 003 766 925 (administrators appointed)
First Plaintiff
Geoffrey and Andrew Barnden in their capacities as joint and several voluntary administrators of M Webster Holdings Pty Limited (administrators appointed) ACN 003 766 925
Second Plaintiffs
Specific Freight Pty Limited ACN 006 664 124
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Corporations and Corporate Insolvency / Application for Disposal of Goods Under S 442 C(2) of Corporations Act 2001 (cth); Urgent Hearing; Orders Made
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether administrators are justified in disposing of goods held by freight forwarder in the ordinary course of business
- 2 Whether suppliers with retention of title clauses must be protected in proceeds of sale
- 3 Arrangements for suppliers to claim against sale proceeds fund
Ratio Decidendi
It is appropriate to direct that administrators are justified in selling the goods in the ordinary course of business as proposed, given that the regime for setting aside proceeds and notifying suppliers provides adequate protection and balances urgency with suppliers' interests.
Court Disposition
Application granted; orders made authorising sale of goods, setting aside of sale proceeds fund, notification to suppliers, and regime for claims.
Orders
- Leave granted to file amended originating process.
- Specific Freight to make goods available to first plaintiff within defined periods as per orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment