SPEERS V DE VRIES & ORS [1999] NSWSC 7
There is a serious question to be tried regarding the status and value of admitted creditors and the plaintiff's entitlement. The balance of convenience favours continuation of the restraining order on the administrator to prevent disposition of the company's property until the second creditors' meeting has occurred and the position is clarified.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Speers; First Defendant: De Vries; Second Defendant: Second Defendant; Third Defendant: Third Defendant; Fourth Defendant: Fourth Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Continuation of Ex Parte Injunction
- Outcome
- Injunction order extended (with modification) against first defendant as voluntary administrator; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Voluntary Administration, Creditor Status, Interlocutory Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Speers
Plaintiff
De Vries
First Defendant
Second Defendant
Second Defendant
Third Defendant
Third Defendant
Fourth Defendant
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Continuation of Ex Parte Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the administrator's decision to admit certain creditors and the value of creditors' debts was correct
- 2 Whether an injunction restraining the administrator from dealing with company property should be continued
Ratio Decidendi
There is a serious question to be tried regarding the status and value of admitted creditors and the plaintiff's entitlement. The balance of convenience favours continuation of the restraining order on the administrator to prevent disposition of the company's property until the second creditors' meeting has occurred and the position is clarified.
Court Disposition
Injunction order extended (with modification) against first defendant as voluntary administrator; costs reserved.
Orders
- The first defendant as voluntary administrator of the company restrained from entering into any contract for sale or lease of the properties of the company.
- The first defendant restrained from dealing with the cash deposit of the company other than to pay creditors (excluding the plaintiff and the second, third, and fourth defendants).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment