Sportsbet Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (No 7) [2009] FCA 1585
The trial should be adjourned to early February 2010 due to the applicant's genuine inability to proceed as a result of late and voluminous discovery, lack of readiness of documentary evidence, and inadequate preparation; however, the applicant is not permitted to rely upon further economic evidence regarding the...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application (adjournment and Procedural Orders)
- Outcome
- Trial adjourned; costs awarded to respondents; adjournment allowed but not for purpose of adducing new economic evidence.
- Legal Topics
- ['adjournment' 'race Fields Legislation' 'section 92 of the Constitution' 'discovery' 'costs Applications' 'case Management']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application (adjournment and Procedural Orders)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceedings should be adjourned and, if so, on what terms' 'Whether Sportsbet should be permitted to rely on further economic evidence regarding the national wagering market' 'Responsibility for delay and preparation']
Ratio Decidendi
The trial should be adjourned to early February 2010 due to the applicant's genuine inability to proceed as a result of late and voluminous discovery, lack of readiness of documentary evidence, and inadequate preparation; however, the applicant is not permitted to rely upon further economic evidence regarding the national wagering market as its failure to adduce such evidence earlier was due to its own forensic decisions. Sportsbet is to pay the respondents' costs of the adjournment and the issue of indemnity costs is reserved to trial.
Court Disposition
Trial adjourned; costs awarded to respondents; adjournment allowed but not for purpose of adducing new economic evidence.
Orders
- ['Hearing of the trial fixed for 1 December 2009 vacated.' 'Applicant to pay respondents’ costs of adjournment and costs thrown away due to vacation of trial.' 'Issue of indemnity costs reserved for trial.' 'Trial fixed for seven days commencing 5 February 2010 (dates adjusted as per judgment).' 'Procedural...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment