Sportsbet Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (No 9) [2010] FCA 31
Notices to produce must not be used as a substitute for discovery and may be set aside where they do not meet the requisite threshold of apparent relevance or are speculative fishing expeditions rather than targeted requests for relevant evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Practice and Procedure / Interlocutory Application—challenge to Notices to Produce
- Outcome
- Notice to produce set aside in part; costs awarded to applicant
- Legal Topics
- ['notices to Produce' 'discovery Versus Notices to Produce' 'apparent Relevance Standard']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure / Interlocutory Application—challenge to Notices to Produce
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the notices to produce are a substitute for discovery' "Whether the documents sought are 'reasonably likely' to add to the relevant evidence in the case" 'Whether the notices to produce are speculative or amount to a fishing expedition']
Ratio Decidendi
Notices to produce must not be used as a substitute for discovery and may be set aside where they do not meet the requisite threshold of apparent relevance or are speculative fishing expeditions rather than targeted requests for relevant evidence.
Court Disposition
Notice to produce set aside in part; costs awarded to applicant
Orders
- ['The notice to produce of 24 December 2009, dealing with funding of legal expenses, is set aside.' 'The notice to produce of 24 December 2009, dealing with the press, is set aside.' 'The notice to produce of 6 January 2010 (misdated 6 December 2010), dealing with web pages, is set aside.' 'The notice to produce of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment