Springlands Developments Pty Ltd v Burwood Council [2017] NSWLEC 1516
The Court determined that, as the amended plans satisfied all relevant statutory and planning controls and addressed both Council's and residents' concerns as confirmed by joint expert reports, there was no reason to refuse consent; thus, the appeal was upheld and consent was granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'mixed Use Development' 'heritage Impact' 'amenity' 'council Refusal' 'resident Objections']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the amended development application satisfies planning controls and addresses Council's prior contentions" 'Whether resident concerns regarding traffic, overshadowing, and privacy are satisfactorily addressed']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court determined that, as the amended plans satisfied all relevant statutory and planning controls and addressed both Council's and residents' concerns as confirmed by joint expert reports, there was no reason to refuse consent; thus, the appeal was upheld and consent was granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld' 'Development application 53/2016 for demolition of existing structures and the erection of a new 18 storey mixed use building, including 43 residential apartments, 16 serviced apartments, 72 car parking spaces at 12 14 Gloucester Street, Burwood, is approved, subject to the conditions in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment