Guha v Guha [2021] NSWCA 245

Guha v Guha [2021] NSWCA 245

Although the appellant lacked the means to pay for legal assistance, she had already received a pro bono referral earlier in the year, so special reasons were required for a further referral. The proposed appeal depended on an alleged mediation agreement, but the available inference was that no enforceable mediation...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 October 2021
Procedural Posture
Application in Appeal for Referral for Pro Bono Legal Assistance / Notice of Motion Dated 20 September 2021 Before the Court of Appeal
Outcome
The appellant's notice of motion was dismissed.
Legal Topics
['referral for Pro Bono Assistance' 'special Reasons for Further Referral' 'prospects of Success' 'mediation Agreement']
['practice and Procedure' 'appeals' 'civil Procedure'] ['referral for Pro Bono Assistance' 'special Reasons for Further Referral' 'prospects of Success' 'mediation Agreement']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application in Appeal for Referral for Pro Bono Legal Assistance / Notice of Motion Dated 20 September 2021 Before the Court of Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether the appellant should be referred to the Registrar for referral to a barrister or solicitor on the Pro Bono Panel for legal assistance under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).' 'Whether special reasons justified a further referral where the appellant had received a referral for pro bono assistance within the preceding three years.' 'Whether the proposed appeal based on an alleged mediation agreement had sufficient prospects of success to warrant a referral.']

Ratio Decidendi

Although the appellant lacked the means to pay for legal assistance, she had already received a pro bono referral earlier in the year, so special reasons were required for a further referral. The proposed appeal depended on an alleged mediation agreement, but the available inference was that no enforceable mediation agreement had been reached, the issue had not been raised below, and the appellant had already raised it with her previous pro bono lawyers. The proposed appeal had no prospects of success and no special reasons justified another referral.

Court Disposition

The appellant's notice of motion was dismissed.

Orders

  • ["Dismiss the appellant's notice of motion of 20 September 2021."]