SRGD No.2 Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2023] NSWLEC 1417
The Court was satisfied the proposed modification results in a development 'substantially the same' as that originally approved and that no jurisdictional prerequisites prevent making orders. Accordingly, the application was approved pursuant to the parties' s 34 agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Modification Application (class 1 Appeal) / Final Decision After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Modification application approved; appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'section 4.55 Application' 'development Consent' 'conciliation Conference' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Modification Application (class 1 Appeal) / Final Decision After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proposed modification results in a development that is 'substantially the same' as originally approved" 'Whether jurisdictional prerequisites for consent modification are satisfied' "Whether the Court should make orders according to parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied the proposed modification results in a development 'substantially the same' as that originally approved and that no jurisdictional prerequisites prevent making orders. Accordingly, the application was approved pursuant to the parties' s 34 agreement.
Court Disposition
Modification application approved; appeal upheld
Orders
- ["Applicant to pay Respondent's costs thrown away, in the sum of $8000 within 14 days" 'Appeal is upheld' "Modification Application is approved subject to consolidated conditions of Development Consent in Annexure 'A'"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment