Darshn v Avant Insurance Limited [2021] FCA 232
The categories (e) and (f) of documents requested from the first respondent are relevant to the issues in the proceeding, are not overly broad or oppressive when properly limited, and should be produced subject to legal professional privilege claims.
- Parties
- Applicant: Sri Balakrishnan Darshn; First Respondent: Avant Insurance Limited; Second Respondent: Medical Insurance Australia Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory Orders Regarding Production of Documents
- Outcome
- interlocutory orders made regarding production of documents and procedural timetable
- Legal Topics
- Production of Documents, Relevance, Oppression, Professional Indemnity Insurance, Claims Made Policies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sri Balakrishnan Darshn
Applicant
Avant Insurance Limited
First Respondent
Medical Insurance Australia Pty Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Orders Regarding Production of Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 whether requested documents are relevant to any issue raised in the proceeding
- 2 whether category of documents is too broad or oppressive
- 3 operation of s 40(3) and s 54 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
The categories (e) and (f) of documents requested from the first respondent are relevant to the issues in the proceeding, are not overly broad or oppressive when properly limited, and should be produced subject to legal professional privilege claims.
Court Disposition
interlocutory orders made regarding production of documents and procedural timetable
Orders
- First respondent to produce categories (e) and (f) of documents by 23 March 2021, subject to privilege claims.
- Privilege claims to be justified by affidavit by 26 March 2021, documents kept sealed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment