Chundru v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 480
The applicant failed to identify any arguable error by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia in its treatment of the issues before it, and the Court could see no basis for finding jurisdictional error by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The criteria for leave to appeal, and therefore an extension of time for leave to appeal, were not satisfied.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Application for Extension of Time for Leave to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'student Visa' 'administrative Appeals Tribunal Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Application for Extension of Time for Leave to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time for leave to appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia decision.' 'Whether the Federal Circuit Court of Australia erred in finding no jurisdictional error by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.' 'Whether the applicant established sufficient doubt in the decision and substantial injustice warranting leave to appeal.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to identify any arguable error by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia in its treatment of the issues before it, and the Court could see no basis for finding jurisdictional error by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The criteria for leave to appeal, and therefore an extension of time for leave to appeal, were not satisfied.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.' 'The applicant pay the costs of the first respondent of and incidental to the application to be taxed or agreed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment