St George Bank Limited v Archer Philip Field [2007] NSWSC 902
The amended commercial list response was struck out due to complete non-compliance with Practice Note SC Eq 3; no arguable defence was raised that was not expressly precluded by the guarantee’s contractual terms, which were enforceable per the authorities cited; accordingly, summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff was warranted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial List Proceeding / Application for Summary Judgment and Motion to Strike Out Amended Commercial List Response
- Outcome
- Amended commercial list response struck out; summary judgment entered for the plaintiff; costs awarded to the plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- ['summary Judgment' 'strike Out Pleading' 'guarantee and Indemnity' 'practice Note SC Eq 3' 'defences to Guarantee']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Commercial List Proceeding / Application for Summary Judgment and Motion to Strike Out Amended Commercial List Response
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the amended commercial list response should be struck out for non-compliance with Practice Note SC Eq 3' 'Whether the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on the guarantee and indemnity' 'Whether the defendant is entitled to raise certain defences to the guarantee']
Ratio Decidendi
The amended commercial list response was struck out due to complete non-compliance with Practice Note SC Eq 3; no arguable defence was raised that was not expressly precluded by the guarantee’s contractual terms, which were enforceable per the authorities cited; accordingly, summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff was warranted.
Court Disposition
Amended commercial list response struck out; summary judgment entered for the plaintiff; costs awarded to the plaintiff.
Orders
- ['The amended commercial list response filed on 26 July 2007 is struck out.' 'Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff in the sum of $6,800,632.72, together with interest on the principal component from 2 August 2007 until the date of entry of judgment.' 'Exhibits to remain with the papers for 28 days, to be held...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment