Bahonko v Nurses Board of Victoria (No 3) [2007] FCA 491
Ms Saunders is restrained from acting as solicitor for the first respondent in these proceedings due to the real likelihood her conduct will require evaluation and she may need to justify or defend herself, impacting independence and the administration of justice; Russell Kennedy is not restrained as a firm as there are no specific allegations against any partners and their involvement is not directly implicated.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Judgment on Interlocutory Application to Restrain Solicitors
- Outcome
- Ms Saunders restrained from acting for First Respondent; Russell Kennedy allowed to continue as solicitors for First Respondent
- Legal Topics
- ['inherent Jurisdiction of Court' 'restraint of Legal Practitioners' 'conflict of Interest']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment on Interlocutory Application to Restrain Solicitors
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Ms Saunders and Russell Kennedy should be restrained from acting as solicitors for the first respondent due to alleged conflict of interest or risk of misuse of confidential information']
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Saunders is restrained from acting as solicitor for the first respondent in these proceedings due to the real likelihood her conduct will require evaluation and she may need to justify or defend herself, impacting independence and the administration of justice; Russell Kennedy is not restrained as a firm as there are no specific allegations against any partners and their involvement is not directly implicated.
Court Disposition
Ms Saunders restrained from acting for First Respondent; Russell Kennedy allowed to continue as solicitors for First Respondent
Orders
- ['Ms Saunders restrained from acting as solicitor for the first respondent' 'Russell Kennedy not restrained from acting as solicitors for the first respondent']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment