Potepa, Stanislowa v Comcare Australia [1996] FCA 629

Potepa, Stanislowa v Comcare Australia [1996] FCA 629

The Tribunal did not commit any error of law in its decision of 12 July 1995 affirming refusal of compensation; the medical evidence did not support a causal connection between the applicant's symptoms and her employment.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Stanisłowa Potepa; Respondent: Comcare Australia
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 June 1996
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Topics
Appeal on a Question of Law, Workers' Compensation, Jurisdiction of the Federal Court, Review of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decisions
Administrative Law Appeal on a Question of Law Workers' Compensation Jurisdiction of the Federal Court Review of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decisions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stanisłowa Potepa

Applicant

Comcare Australia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal committed an error of law in affirming the decision to refuse payment of compensation for alleged work injury.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal did not commit any error of law in its decision of 12 July 1995 affirming refusal of compensation; the medical evidence did not support a causal connection between the applicant's symptoms and her employment.