DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LAND & WATER CONSERVATION v STANLEY ARTHUR JONES [1998] NSWLEC 51 (1 April 1998) [1998] NSWLEC 67
The defendant is convicted and a monetary penalty imposed, reduced due to a guilty plea, cooperation, contrition, no prior record, and agreement to pay prosecutor's costs. Specific deterrence is not needed but general deterrence is required for clearing contractors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Sentence After Plea of Guilty
- Outcome
- conviction and monetary penalty
- Legal Topics
- ['offence Against S 76(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979' 'clearing Native Vegetation Without Consent' 'penalty After Guilty Plea']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentence After Plea of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant should be penalised for clearing native vegetation without the required consent' 'Appropriate penalty and mitigating circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant is convicted and a monetary penalty imposed, reduced due to a guilty plea, cooperation, contrition, no prior record, and agreement to pay prosecutor's costs. Specific deterrence is not needed but general deterrence is required for clearing contractors.
Court Disposition
conviction and monetary penalty
Orders
- ['The defendant is convicted of the offence as charged.' 'The defendant must pay a penalty in the sum of $3000.' "The defendant must pay the Prosecutor's costs in the sum of $7000 but is allowed 12 months to pay those costs." 'Exhibits may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment