R v Miller [2001] NSWCCA 209
For the purposes of s 73 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), a 'step-father' is a man who is married to the mother of the child; a de facto relationship is insufficient to create the step-father and step-daughter relationship required by the section.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal; Appeal Under S 5 F(3) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (nsw) From District Court Interlocutory Ruling
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['carnal Knowledge' 'statutory Interpretation' 'meaning of Step Father and Step Daughter' 'position of Authority and Control']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal; Appeal Under S 5 F(3) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (nsw) From District Court Interlocutory Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the relationship of step-father and step-daughter under s 73 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) requires marriage between the offender and the mother of the child, or whether a de facto relationship or position of authority and control is sufficient.']
Ratio Decidendi
For the purposes of s 73 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), a 'step-father' is a man who is married to the mother of the child; a de facto relationship is insufficient to create the step-father and step-daughter relationship required by the section.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment