Stanmore Developments Pty Ltd v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1116
The proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement reached at conciliation and as permitted by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, with orders made to give effect to the agreed modifications to the development consent.
- Parties
- Applicant: Stanmore Developments Pty Ltd; Respondent: Inner West Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Modification Application (class 1) / Post Conciliation Determination (orders Following Agreement)
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Modification granted by consent and orders made under s 34(3).
- Legal Topics
- Modification of Development Consent, Conciliation Conference, Court Order Under Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stanmore Developments Pty Ltd
Applicant
Inner West Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Modification Application (class 1) / Post Conciliation Determination (orders Following Agreement)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to approve modification of development consent per agreement under s 34(3) of Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement reached at conciliation and as permitted by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, with orders made to give effect to the agreed modifications to the development consent.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Modification granted by consent and orders made under s 34(3).
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended architectural plans and elevations referred to in paragraph 1b. of the document titled Modifications to the conditions of consent in Annexure 'A'.
- The appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment