State of New South Wales v Hamod & Ors [2011] NSWCA 376
There was no error in Harrison J's exercise of discretion in refusing set-off; the circumstances of the prior costs order and its nature remained relevant, and the conclusion reached was not unreasonable or unjust. The appeal fails as no House v The King error was established.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of New South Wales; First Respondent: Anthony Hamod; Second Respondent: Simon Diab
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed with costs (Hamod’s costs on a submitting basis)
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Set Off, Lien, Exercise of Discretion
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of New South Wales
Appellant
Anthony Hamod
First Respondent
Simon Diab
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the State is entitled to set off costs payable to Anthony Hamod against costs payable by Hamod to the State
- 2 Whether the discretion in declining set-off was correctly exercised
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error in Harrison J's exercise of discretion in refusing set-off; the circumstances of the prior costs order and its nature remained relevant, and the conclusion reached was not unreasonable or unjust. The appeal fails as no House v The King error was established.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed with costs (Hamod’s costs on a submitting basis)
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted and notice of appeal to be filed within seven days.
- Appeal dismissed with costs, in the case of Mr Hamod the costs to be on a submitting basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment