Patten -V- State Of New South Wales [1997] NSWEOT
The Tribunal found that the Respondents' conduct in stopping and publicly humiliating the Complainant was motivated by his race and constituted discrimination contrary to sections 7 and 19 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). By majority, the Tribunal further found, in all the circumstances including the public nature of the conduct and the use of the racial slur, that the Respondents' conduct amounted to racial vilification under section 20C(1) of the Act. The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that the police officers had consented to the recording, making the Listening Devices Act inapplicable. Damages were awarded for hurt, distress, humiliation, and other...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Discrimination Complaint / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Complainant succeeds in respect of claims for racial discrimination and by majority for racial vilification; damages awarded.
- Legal Topics
- ['racial Vilification' 'discrimination on the Ground of Race' 'provision of Goods and Services' 'use of Listening Devices']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Discrimination Complaint / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the complainant was discriminated against on the basis of race in provision of services' 'Whether the Respondents engaged in racial vilification in breach of Section 20C of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)' 'Whether the Listening Devices Act 1984 (NSW) prevents the use of certain recordings in the proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondents' conduct in stopping and publicly humiliating the Complainant was motivated by his race and constituted discrimination contrary to sections 7 and 19 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). By majority, the Tribunal further found, in all the circumstances including the public nature of the conduct and the use of the racial slur, that the Respondents' conduct amounted to racial vilification under section 20C(1) of the Act. The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that the police officers had consented to the recording, making the Listening Devices Act inapplicable. Damages were awarded for hurt, distress, humiliation, and other...
Court Disposition
Complainant succeeds in respect of claims for racial discrimination and by majority for racial vilification; damages awarded.
Orders
- ['The Respondents are ordered to pay the Complainant the sum of $25,000 by way of damages within 30 days from the date hereof.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment