State of New South Wales v Kaiser [2022] NSWCA 86
A person is a 'supervised offender' for the purposes of s 5B(b) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) if they met the criteria in s 5I(2) when the application was made; it is not necessary that the status persist to the point of determination. An extended supervision order may commence on the date it is made, and does not need to await the expiration of a sentence that is not within the s 5I(2) categories.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of New South Wales; Respondent: Brian Kaiser
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Extended Supervision Orders, Statutory Interpretation, High Risk Offenders, Community Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of New South Wales
Appellant
Brian Kaiser
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondent was a 'supervised offender' at the relevant time under Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act s 5I;
- 2 Whether an extended supervision order could commence earlier than expiration of respondent's current sentence;
- 3 Proper construction of s 5B(b) and s 5I of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act
Ratio Decidendi
A person is a 'supervised offender' for the purposes of s 5B(b) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) if they met the criteria in s 5I(2) when the application was made; it is not necessary that the status persist to the point of determination. An extended supervision order may commence on the date it is made, and does not need to await the expiration of a sentence that is not within the s 5I(2) categories.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted pursuant to s 22(3) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) and s 103 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW);
- Orders 2 and 3 of the Supreme Court of 8 June 2021 set aside;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment