State of New South Wales v Hardy [2021] NSWSC 323
The court was satisfied that the supporting documentation relied upon by the State, if proved, would justify the making of an extended supervision order under s 27(b) of the Terrorism (High Risk) Offenders Act 2017. Subject to certain modifications of proposed conditions, and deletion of some as being oppressive or...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interim Supervision Order / Preliminary/interlocutory Determination on Interim Orders
- Outcome
- Interim Supervision Order granted for 28 days with modified and tailored conditions; examination orders made; proceedings stood over.
- Legal Topics
- ['interim Supervision Order' 'terrorism (high Risk) Offenders Act 2017' 'supervision Conditions' 'risk Assessment' 'procedural Orders']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Interim Supervision Order / Preliminary/interlocutory Determination on Interim Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proposed interim supervision order conditions are appropriate or should be modified' 'Whether supporting documentation would, if proved, justify the making of an extended supervision order' 'Whether conditions imposed are proportionate and necessary']
Ratio Decidendi
The court was satisfied that the supporting documentation relied upon by the State, if proved, would justify the making of an extended supervision order under s 27(b) of the Terrorism (High Risk) Offenders Act 2017. Subject to certain modifications of proposed conditions, and deletion of some as being oppressive or disproportionate, an Interim Supervision Order for 28 days with appropriately tailored conditions was justified pending final determination.
Court Disposition
Interim Supervision Order granted for 28 days with modified and tailored conditions; examination orders made; proceedings stood over.
Orders
- ['Order pursuant to s 24(5) of the Terrorism (High Risk) Offenders Act 2017 appointing a qualified psychiatrist and a registered psychologist to examine Christopher Bruce Hardy and furnish reports to the Court.' 'Order directing Christopher Bruce Hardy to attend those examinations.' 'Order pursuant to s 27 of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment