State of New South Wales v Sutton (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 875

State of New South Wales v Sutton (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 875

The extended supervision order for three years with specified conditions was warranted given the evidence of Mr Sutton's long history of violent offending, persistent risk factors particularly relating to substance and alcohol abuse, difficulty in treatment, and expert recommendations. The order duration was justified to address risk to community safety and to support rehabilitation, with both applicant and respondent agreeing supervision is necessary but disagreeing on length.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 June 2017
Procedural Posture
Application for Extended Supervision Order / Final Hearing
Outcome
Final extended supervision order granted for three years with conditions as sought by State.
Legal Topics
['high Risk Offender' 'extended Supervision Order' 'risk Assessment' 'order Duration']
['criminal Law' 'public Safety'] ['high Risk Offender' 'extended Supervision Order' 'risk Assessment' 'order Duration']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extended Supervision Order / Final Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Mr Sutton qualifies as a high risk violent offender under statutory definitions' 'Whether an extended supervision order should be granted, and for what duration' 'Whether the proposed schedule of conditions sufficiently addresses risk factors']

Ratio Decidendi

The extended supervision order for three years with specified conditions was warranted given the evidence of Mr Sutton's long history of violent offending, persistent risk factors particularly relating to substance and alcohol abuse, difficulty in treatment, and expert recommendations. The order duration was justified to address risk to community safety and to support rehabilitation, with both applicant and respondent agreeing supervision is necessary but disagreeing on length.

Court Disposition

Final extended supervision order granted for three years with conditions as sought by State.

Orders

  • ['Defendant, Eric Mitchell Sutton, subject to a high risk violent offender extended supervision order for three years under ss. 5F and 9(l)(a) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW).' 'Defendant to comply with Schedule of Conditions outlined in judgment, including reporting, electronic monitoring,...