State of New South Wales v Peckham (Preliminary) [2019] NSWSC 1150
Based on psychiatric evidence, particularly the report of Dr Furst, the defendant poses an unacceptable risk of causing serious harm to others, and this risk cannot be adequately managed by less restrictive means. Therefore, interim extension orders are appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension Order (forensic Patient) / Preliminary Orders
- Outcome
- interim extension order made; other procedural orders granted
- Legal Topics
- ['forensic Patient Status' 'extension Order' 'unacceptable Risk' 'mental Illness' 'interim Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension Order (forensic Patient) / Preliminary Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['whether defendant poses an unacceptable risk of causing serious harm to others if ceases being a forensic patient' 'whether risk can be adequately managed by less restrictive means']
Ratio Decidendi
Based on psychiatric evidence, particularly the report of Dr Furst, the defendant poses an unacceptable risk of causing serious harm to others, and this risk cannot be adequately managed by less restrictive means. Therefore, interim extension orders are appropriate.
Court Disposition
interim extension order made; other procedural orders granted
Orders
- ['Appointment of two qualified psychiatrists, psychologists, and/or registered medical practitioners to examine defendant and furnish reports by 25 October 2019' 'Defendant directed to attend those examinations' 'Interim extension order commencing from 16 September 2019 for three months' 'Access to court file...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment