State of New South Wales v Peckham (Preliminary) [2019] NSWSC 1150

State of New South Wales v Peckham (Preliminary) [2019] NSWSC 1150

Based on psychiatric evidence, particularly the report of Dr Furst, the defendant poses an unacceptable risk of causing serious harm to others, and this risk cannot be adequately managed by less restrictive means. Therefore, interim extension orders are appropriate.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 September 2019
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension Order (forensic Patient) / Preliminary Orders
Outcome
interim extension order made; other procedural orders granted
Legal Topics
['forensic Patient Status' 'extension Order' 'unacceptable Risk' 'mental Illness' 'interim Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension Order (forensic Patient) / Preliminary Orders

  1. 1 ['whether defendant poses an unacceptable risk of causing serious harm to others if ceases being a forensic patient' 'whether risk can be adequately managed by less restrictive means']

Ratio Decidendi

Based on psychiatric evidence, particularly the report of Dr Furst, the defendant poses an unacceptable risk of causing serious harm to others, and this risk cannot be adequately managed by less restrictive means. Therefore, interim extension orders are appropriate.

Court Disposition

interim extension order made; other procedural orders granted

Orders

  • ['Appointment of two qualified psychiatrists, psychologists, and/or registered medical practitioners to examine defendant and furnish reports by 25 October 2019' 'Defendant directed to attend those examinations' 'Interim extension order commencing from 16 September 2019 for three months' 'Access to court file...